Most ideas come from previous ideas. The sixties, particularly in the ARPAcommunity, gave rise to a host of notions about "human-computer symbiosis"through interactive time-shared computers, graphics screens and pointing devices. Advanced computer languages were invented to simulate complex systemssuch as oil refineries and semi-intelligent behavior. The soon-to-follow paradigmshift of modern personal computing, overlapping window interfaces, and object-oriented design came from seeing the work of the sixties as somethingmore than a "better old thing." That is, more than a better way: to do mainframecomputing; for end-users to invoke functionality; to make data structures moreabstract. Instead the promise of exponential growth in computing/$/volumedemanded that the sixties be regarded as "almost a new thing" and to find outwhat the actual "new things" might be. For example, one would compute with ahandheld "Dynabook" in a way that would not be possible on a shared mainframe;millions of potential users meant that the user interface would have tobecome a learning environment along the lines of Montessori and Bruner; andneeds for large scope, reduction in complexity, and end-user literacy would require that data and control structures be done away with in favor of a morebiological scheme of protected universal cells interacting only through messagesthat could mimic any desired behavior.
Right around this time we were involved in another conflict with Xerox management, in particularwith Don Pendery the head "planner". He really didn't understand what we were talking about andinstead was interested in "trends" and"what was the future going to be like"and how could Xerox "defend againstit." I got so upset I said to him, "Look.The best way to predict the future is toinvent it. Don't worry about what allthose other people might do, this isthe century in which almost any clear vision can be made!" He remainedunconvinced, and that led to the famous "Pendery Papers for PARCPlanning Purposes," a collection ofessays on various aspects of the future. Mine proposed a version of the notebook as a "Display Transducer",and Jim Mitchell's was entitled "NLSon a Minicomputer."
Essay About Physical Environment mesenger troyano arl
As I mentioned previously, it was annoying that the surface beauty of LISP was marred by some of its keyparts having to be introduced as "special forms" ratherthan as its supposed universal building block offunctions. The actual beauty of LISP came more from thepromise of its metastructures than its actual model. I spenta fair amount of time thinking about how objects couldbe characterized as universal computers without having to have any exceptions in the centralmetaphor. What seemed to be needed was complete control over what was passed in a message send;in particular when and in what environment did expressions get evaluated?
Dan finished the Smalltalk-76 design November, and he, Dave Robson, Ted Kaehler, and Diana Merry, successfullyimplemented the system from scratch (which includedrewriting all of the existing class definitions) in justseven months. this was such a wonderful achievementthat I was bowled over in spite of my wanting to startover. It was fast, lively, could handle "big" problems, andwas great fun. The system consisted of about 50 classes described in about 180 pages of source code. This includedall of the OS functions, files, printing and other Ethernetservices, the window interface, editors, graphics andpainting systems, and two new contributions by LarryTesler, the famous browsers for static methods in theinheritance hierarchy and dynamic contexts for debuggingin the runtime environment. In every way it was the consolidation of all of our ideas and yearning aboutSmalltalk in one integrated package. All Smalltalks sincehave resembled this conception very closely. In manyways, as Tony Hoare once remarked about Algol, Dan'sSmalltalk-76 was a great improvement on its successors!
Marked global climatic warming occurred at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary, about 56-55 million years ago (Ma) (Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, or PETM; Figure 1). At the PETM, it has been posited that massive amounts of greenhouse gases entered the atmosphere, the source of which is unclear (Zachos et al., 2008). Major extinctions of benthic foraminifera in the oceans (Zachos et al., 2001) and terrestrial mammals coincided with these changes, and new orders of mammals emerged (Gingerich, 2006). As a result of warm climates during the Eocene, increases in plant diversity created new environmental niches favorable for primates. With the possible exception of Altiatlasius, a species from the Paleocene of Morocco, the oldest euprimates are found at the base of the Eocene. These early primates are known from China, western Europe, and North America and may have dispersed across a warm, wet, northern forest (Smith et al., 2006). Primates flourished throughout parts of North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa in the warm and humid Early and Middle Eocene, and during this time we find the first record of several major primate groups: anthropoids, adapiforms, tarsiers, and omomyiforms (Covert, 1986, 2002; Smith et al. 2006; Williams et al., 2010). They share features with living primates that are not found in plesiadapiforms, including large, convergent orbits with a bony bar on the lateral rims. These and other cranial features indicate an increasing reliance on vision rather than smell or tactile senses, and may have evolved in association with insect predation in low light environments such as the canopies and understories of tropical forests (Cartmill, 1992; Ravosa & Savakova, 2004). Many of these early primates were extremely small, some of them smaller than any primates living today (Gebo, 2004). All known taxa display postcranial adaptations suggesting arboreality and many appear to have used leaping to bridge gaps in the forest (Covert, 1986).
2ff7e9595c
Comments